Laynce Nix's incredible 2010 season

3 Comments

You say incredible doesn’t describe it? Well, no, for a bench player to be hitting .225/.265/.396 with four homers and 12 RBI in 111 at-bats three and a half months into the season isn’t particularly notable. In fact, it’s not far off from what should have been expected. My preseason projection called for him to hit .233/.284/.434 with six homers and 18 RBI in 129 at-bats.
What I think makes it incredible is just how bad Nix has been outside of a three-day span. On May 20, Nix got a start against the Braves, his first in 10 days. He promptly went 3-for-5 with a solo homer and a two-run double. It was good timing for him, as the Reds were in Cleveland the following three days, making the DH available. Nix started the next two games and went 5-for-8, hitting a homer in each.
And that was it. The Indians threw a southpaw the next day, so the left-handed-hitting Nix returned to the bench. Since Jonny Gomes was also red hot at the time, Nix stayed there after the Reds returned to playing NL teams. He’d make just two starts over the next two weeks, and he wasn’t a big factor once the extended interleague play returned.
So, here’s Nix’s season to date:
April 5-May 19: .171/.227/.317 with one homer and three RBI in 41 at-bats
May 20-May 22: .615/.615/1.538 with three homers and seven RBI in 13 at-bats
May 23-Present: .175/.217/.193 with no homers and two RBI in 57 at-bats
Outside of the three-day stretch, Nix is hitting .173 with one homer, five RBI and 26 strikeouts in 98 at-bats.
What I also find pretty remarkable is that he’s been intentionally walked twice in the last two weeks. That’s actually what’s driving up his OBP. His last unintentional walk came on May 2, and all three since have been of the intentional variety. He has more intentional walks than runs batted in since May 23.
Nix’s time in Cincinnati could come to an end soon. The Reds just placed Chris Dickerson (wrist) on a rehab assignment, and if he impresses, it’s possible he’ll replace Nix on the bench in a couple of weeks. So far, he’s 3-for-6 with three walks in three games. The Reds would probably rather keep Nix if he regains his stroke, since he is the one legitimate power hitter on their bench. Nix, though, has simply never made enough contact to be particularly useful to a major league team. Whether it’s Dickerson or someone from outside of the organization, the Reds should upgrade.

Reds’ manager Bryan Price extended through 2017

PHOENIX, AZ - AUGUST 28: Manager Bryan Price #38 of the Cincinnati Reds looks on during the fifth inning against the Arizona Diamondbacks at Chase Field on August 28, 2016 in Phoenix, Arizona.  (Photo by Norm Hall/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Reds will roll with manager Bryan Price for at least one more season. Per MLB.com’s Mark Sheldon, Price has been extended through the 2017 season with a club option for 2018. He won’t be the only familiar face leading the team, as the Reds have reportedly asked the entire coaching staff to return as well.

This is Price’s second consecutive season with 90+ losses since Cincinnati signed him to a three-year contract back in 2014. While he hasn’t been able to replicate the same kind of success that former skipper Dusty Baker found in 2012 and 2013, he’s been saddled with a team that’s still in the throes of rebuilding, not one that looks on the cusp of playoff contention. It is, after all, the same team that has not seen a healthy season from Homer Bailey since Price’s arrival, one that unloaded Jay Bruce for a pair of prospects earlier this year and one whose pitching staff set a single-season record for most home runs given up by a major league team.

Justifying Price’s extension requires a different kind of yardstick, one that measures player development and individual success over the cumulative win-loss record. Here, Price has overseen solid performances from contributors like Adam Duvall, who is batting .244/.297/.506 with 2.9 fWAR in his first full major-league season, as well as young arms like Anthony DeSclafani, Brandon Finnegan, and Michael Lorenzen, among others.

From comments made by Reds’ CFO Bob Castellini, Price’s success within a rough rebuilding process appears to have cemented his place within the club, at least for the time being.

I like the young, aggressive team Walt and Dick have put together with players from within our system and from recent trades. […] Bryan has been here seven seasons now. He’s comfortable with the direction we are heading with our young players, and we are comfortable with him leading us in that direction.

Dusty Baker calls the Nationals “a baby making team.” Whatever that means.

PHILADELPHIA, PA - AUGUST 31: Manager Dusty Baker #12 of the Washington Nationals looks on before the start of a game against the Philadelphia Phillies at Citizens Bank Park on August 31, 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Rich Schultz/Getty Images)
Getty Images
10 Comments

When the Nationals fired Matt Williams a year ago, it might’ve been a safe assumption that they were going to go with that new breed of young, handsome recently-retired player-turned-manager who, despite a lack of experience, allegedly knows how to deal with modern players better and knows how to handle a clubhouse. Those assumptions have proved largely off with these guys — Williams was a disaster, Matheny wins despite himself and Ausmus looks like he’s perpetually on the verge of a breakdown — but that’s the all the rage these days anyway.

Instead, the Nats hired Dusty Baker. Though Baker had tremendous success as a manager everywhere he went, he was maligned by some for some pitcher handling stuff in Chicago (which said pitchers have long denied was an issue, but let’s let that lie). He was also, more generally, thought of as a “retread.” Which is what people who prefer younger folks for jobs tend to call older people, even if the older people know what they’re doing.

And yes, I will cop to thinking about managers that way a lot over the years, so I’m not absolving myself at all here, even if I was pretty OK with the Dusty Baker hiring. I’ve evolved on this point. In no small part because of how Dusty Baker has done in Washington. Flash forward a year, the Nats are division champions and Baker may be a top candidate for Manager of the Year. That, in and of itself, should show you how wrong the haters were.

But if it doesn’t, this sure should:

I have no earthly idea what that means and Castillo gives no further context. All I know is that it sounds cool as hell and of any current manager, only Dusty Baker could say that and pull it off.

Because he’s Dusty Baker and has nothing to prove to you. And if you don’t like it, shoot, he’ll just go back home to his winery or whatever and live out the rest of his days being cooler than you.