I missed this yesterday, but MLBPA chief Michael Weiner said that there is “strong
sentiment” among the union that using the All-Star Game to determine home field advantage for the World
Series is a dumb idea. The players think that home field should be determined by regular-season record:
Weiner said Tuesday that he expected to have “healthy discussions” on
the topic as part of next year’s collective bargaining. He said the
players never embraced the concept of awarding home-field advantage in
the World Series to the the winning league in the All-Star game, but
they reluctantly agreed in order to satisfy FOX, which broadcasts the
Meanwhile, Bud Selig said yesterday in his little press conference that there was no reason to change the All-Star Game format. Of course, one doesn’t go far in this world contradicting your boss’ word, so Selig was probably wise not to say anything that wavered from FOX’s party line.
Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.
The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.
Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.
Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”