Rays’ manager Joe Maddon has played a bunch of games in NL parks lately, and he’s rather enamored of the style of play. So enamored, in fact, that he’s getting rather cavalier about losing his DH via substituting him in on defense in the middle of a game:
“The thing that I’ve really played with a lot this year is there’s
really no reason why you can’t put your DH in the game in an American
League game. The fact that he can play defense, that’s one
thing we have going for us. Whoever DHs for us is able to play a
position and play it pretty well, actually.
“I’ve become more comfortable with that this year. It really expands your bench further, where you don’t have to minimize
your movements. You can leave this guy in the game. You can move the
pitcher’s spot around and you have plenty of options to choose from to
pinch-hit for that pitcher if he happens to show up later.”
I’m glad that Maddon has seen the light on National League play and everything, but let’s be clear about something: if you’re given a DH slot, you probably need to use it and probably should avoid forfeiting it if at all possible.
The only situation where I can see being casual with the DH is when you have a good-hitting catcher that you want to rest up. Typically, AL managers simply give the catcher the day off rather than DHing him because they want to be able to use him on defense if the backup gets hurt or something. If I have a Joe Mauer, however, I’d much rather play him at DH and risk an at bat or two by a pitcher in the event of a catcher injury rather than risk losing three or four Joe Mauer at bats.
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from the city of San Jose arising out of the failure of the city’s antitrust claims against Major League Baseball. The lower court losses which frustrated the city’s lawsuit will stay in place.
By way of background, San Jose sued Major League Baseball in June 2013 for conspiring to block the A’s relocation there on the basis of the San Francisco Giants’ territorial claim. The city said the territory rules violated federal antitrust laws. As I wrote at the time, it was a theoretically righteous argument in a very narrow sense, but that the City of San Jose likely did not have any sort of legal standing to assert the claim for various reasons and that its suit would be unsuccessful.
And now it is.
If there is ever to be a righteous legal challenge of the territorial system, it’ll almost certainly have to come from a club itself. Given the way in which MLB vets its new owners, however, and given how much money these guys rake in, in part, because of the territorial system, its unlikely that that will ever happen.
Mike Trout may not win another MVP award, because Josh Donaldson of the Blue Jays had a great season and voters seem to be leaning his way, but the Angels center fielder just completed his fourth MVP-caliber campaign in four full seasons as a major leaguer.
Trout has now either won the MVP or (presumably) finished runner-up at age 20, age 21, age 22, and age 23. And there were certainly cases to be made that he was deserving of all four MVP awards. It’s been an incredible start to a career. But how incredible?
Here are the all-time leaders in Wins Above Replacement through age 23:
37.6 – Mike Trout
36.0 – Ty Cobb
34.2 – Ted Williams
31.4 – Mel Ott
30.1 – Ken Griffey Jr.
29.7 – Mickey Mantle
27.7 – Alex Rodriguez
27.5 – Al Kaline
26.7 – Arky Vaughan
26.5 – Rogers Hornsby
I mean, just look at the 10 names on that list. Ridiculous, and Trout sits atop all of them.
Trout has been the subject of intense MVP-related debates in three of his four seasons, but regardless of which side of that coin you favor don’t let it obscure the fact that we’re witnessing something truly special here. There’s certainly room to quibble with the exact rankings–WAR is merely one prominent and easy way to do such things–but however you slice it Trout has been one of the best handful of players in the history of baseball through age 23.