UPDATE: Matt Gelb of the Philadelphia Inquirer kept his promise to explain the Mathieson situation and it appears he isn’t going anywhere. Here are the specifics.
Problem is, Mathieson cannot be optioned without going on waivers.
Here is my understanding of Mathieson’s situation:
There are four types of waivers, the rarest being optional waivers.
They are required when a team wishes to option a player who has options
remaining but is more than three calendar years removed from his
major-league debut. Mathieson falls under that category; he made his
debut on June 17, 2006. And he has options left.
So the Phillies had to place Mathieson on waivers regardless. Will they
lose him? Almost certainly no. Optional waivers are revocable, which
means if a team puts a claim in for Mathieson, the Phillies can pull him
Well, I’ve learned something today. How about you?
1:59 PM: Todd Zolecki of MLB.com confirms that Mathieson was designated for assignment, while Matt Gelb tweets that there is a “very small chance” that the Phillies will lose him through a loophole. My head hurts. This has nothing to do with my personal fandom, I swear, but it would be pretty entertaining to see the Mets put in a waiver claim here.
1:47 PM: Well, that was fast. Scott Mathieson was just called up from Triple-A Lehigh Valley on Friday, however he was designated for assignment on Saturday in order to make room on the roster for catcher Dane Sardinha, according to Matt Gelb of the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Mathieson reached cult hero status among some Phillies fans after multiple Tommy John surgeries, posting a 2.43 ERA and 34/12 K/BB ratio over 29 2/3 innings with the IronPigs this season, however he failed to impress in his season debut against the Twins on Friday night, allowing two runs on three hits and a wild pitch with the bases loaded in the ninth inning. The 26-year-old fireballer was yanked after throwing 23 pitches.
There’s some uncertainty as to what this roster move actually means, as Mathieson has options remaining. Assistant general manager Scott Proefrock told Gelb that it was “a procedural move,” but wouldn’t elaborate further. I’m stumped.