Sure, he could have thrown a three-hit shutout and fanned 11, but that wasn’t realistic. As it was, the winner of the most over-hyped competition for a fifth starter’s slot in baseball history was respectable against the Angels last night: Two runs in five innings and change, striking out six.
He walked too many guys — five — and gave up a home run to Hideki Matsui, but (a) he had enough run support to survive the walks; and (b) giving up a home run to Hideki Matsui in his return to Yankee Stadium is probably one of the most easily-pardonable sins imaginable.
And about those walks: as the guys at River Ave. Blues point out this morning, Hughes may have been getting squeezed. Check out the pitch chart. Those little green blocks at the bottom of the zone are strikes that were called balls. This is a continuing theme, of course. It was Jerry Layne doing the squeezing last night.
That aside, Hughes’ start has to be a really encouraging sign for the Yankees. They won the World Series with three decent starting pitchers last year. If Hughes’ debut form holds for the year, they’ll have five.
Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.
The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.
Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.
Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”