What they're saying about the Joe Mauer deal

Leave a comment

Mauer big.jpgAs the foremost Twins dude on the Internets I defer to Aaron’s take on the Mauer deal. But others have weighed in too. Let’s take a look-see:

  • J.C. Bradbury: “I worry that the Twins may have stretched a bit here with this long-term
    commitment . . . But the Twins are one of the best-managed organizations in baseball, so I
    think they deserve the benefit of the doubt.”
  • Matthew Carruth, FanGraphs: “In the short term, this deal is fair to both sides. Where it might get
    dicey is down the line when Mauer reaches his mid-30s. I don’t think him
    staying at catcher is needed for this to work out though. Mauer’s bat
    is good enough to stand a move to first base and he would benefit from a
    likely increase in playing time. My concern is simply that for being on
    the hook for eight years and giving him a full no trade clause, I feel
    the Twins should have gotten a bit more of a discount.”
  • SethSpeaks: “Yes, this deal
    is more than just about baseball, but from a purely baseball aspect,
    it isn’t
    a great deal.”
  • Twinkie Town: “I can’t tell you how ecstatic I am about this.  Right now, this looks
    like a fantastic deal for both sides.  It’s a very fair deal,
    particularly when you expect baseball’s financial market to rebound in
    coming seasons.  As long as Joe stays healthy, that is.”
  • Only Baseball Matters: “That’s how you handle a once-in-a-generation talent. Teams that are
    run by real general managers, and owned by real men who know what the
    hell they are doing, understand this.”
  • TYU: “Yankee fans who were planning on acquiring him to replace Jorge Posada
    will have to look elsewhere.”
  • Mark Steyn: “more bureaucracy, massive IRS expansion, explosive debt, the end of the
    Pax Americana, and global Armageddon.”

That last one was about health care reform, not Mauer specifically. I include it, though, because what with the global Armageddon and all, it’s not like the Twins will really have to worry about the back end of the Mauer contract. Total win-win for Minnesota, really.

Derek Jeter wants to get rid of the Marlins’ home run sculpture

Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Derek Jeter, part-owner of the Marlins, met with Miami-Dade County mayor Carlos Gimenez on Tuesday afternoon at Marlins Park, Douglas Hanks of the Miami Herald reports. They discussed potentially removing the home run sculpture from the ballpark, something that has been on Jeter’s to-do list since he took over.

Gimenez said of the sculpture, “I just don’t think they’re all that crazy about it. I’m not a fan. We’re looking at it. … We’ll see if anything can be done.”

According to Hanks, the sculpture is public property because it was purchased as part of the Art in Public Places program, which requires art to be installed for the public in county-owned buildings. Michael Spring, the cultural chief for Miami-Dade who was present with Jeter and Gimenez on Tuesday, had previously said that the sculpture was “not moveable” and was “permanently installed” because it was designed “specifically” for Marlins Park. On Tuesday, Spring said, “Anything is possible. But it is pretty complicated. And I wanted the mayor and the Marlins to understand how complicated it really was. We got a good look at it today, and they saw how big it was. There’s hydraulics, there’s plumbing, there’s electricity.”

With Jeter having traded Giancarlo Stanton, Marcell Ozuna, and Dee Gordon this offseason, the home run sculpture is arguably one of the last remaining interesting things about the Marlins in 2018. Naturally, he wants to get rid of it.