The only criminal cases I ever handled were white collar corruption things, so maybe I’m missing a couple of the nuances here, but is mounting a full-blown prosecution of the Philadelphia woman who tried to trade sex for World Series tickets via Craigslist really the best use of judicial resources? They had a preliminary hearing yesterday, complete with salacious testimony from the undercover officers and everything. After it was all over they actually added an additional count to the charges against her. Anyone feel safer now?
I suppose it’s possible that they have eliminated all other crime in
Philadelphia the Philly suburbs* so fluky, one-off acts of immaturity are best handled by a double-barreled prosecutorial assault. In the rest of the world, however, this would likely result in an agreed plea to a disorderly conduct charge or something and it would have been over two months ago.
UPDATE: Further evidence — and much more serious evidence at that — that the Philly police have their priorities WAY out of whack. (thanks to reader Ethan Stock for the link)
*UPDATE II: As commenters have noted, the tickets-for-sex prosecution is taking place in the Philly suburbs, not Philly proper, so apologies to the Philadelphia police department and prosecutors for saying that they were responsible. But (a) all above points still stand for the people in Bucks County going after this woman of course; and (b) the link in the first Update shoes that the Philly cops are still whack. Just for different reasons than going after would-be World Series tickets prostitutes.