Earlier today, Craig had some thoughts
on how Pirates general manager Neal Huntington treated right-hander
Matt Capps, who was non-tendered on Saturday. I’m beginning to think
that Huntington announced that he would tender contracts to all of his
arbitration-eligible players only to attempt to drum up some late trade interest in the
26-year-old reliever. It obviously didn’t work.
Huntington defended the surprising decision in an interview with Dejan Kovacevic of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Sunday:
“We spent a ton
of time and energy on this and made an aggressive effort to try to keep
Matt in Pittsburgh. The bottom line is that the arbitration process
allows for these types of decisions to be made. Once you tender a
player, it’s really a no-lose situation for the player. Even if he
loses, he’s going to get a substantial raise. We didn’t feel like going
through the process with Matt was a good decision for us. He felt like
it was better for him to become a free agent than to accept our offer.
He feels like he’s going to get that much, if not more, as a free
agent. They might be right, and they might be wrong. We feel like we
can take that money and apply it elsewhere and do as well as we
expected Matt to do. And, again, we might be right, and we might be
Capps, meanwhile, sees things a bit differently:
“I don’t know
why, I just had a gut feeling about it, even after I read about
Huntington saying he was going to tender me. I just had a gut feeling
this was going to happen. … Well, not so much the non-tender. I
thought they would try to sign me real quick, then trade me away.”
Both sides haven’t closed the door
on re-opening negotiations, but the good news for Capps is that he is
now able to sign with any team. Speaking of which, Nick Piecoro of the
Arizona Republic reports that the Diamondbacks have interest in Capps.
The story of Rick Ankiel is well known by now. He was a phenom pitcher who burst onto the scene with the Cardinals in 1999 and into the 2000 season as one of the top young talents in the game. Then, in the 2000 playoffs, he melted down. He got the yips. Whatever you want to call it, he lost the ability to throw strikes and his pitching career was soon over. He came back, however, against all odds, and remade his career as a solid outfielder.
It’s inspirational and incredible. But there is a lot more to the story that we’ve ever known. We will soon, however, as Ankiel is coming out with a book. Today he took to the airwaves and shared some about it. Including some amazing stuff:
On drinking in his first start after the famous meltdown in Game One of the 2000 National League division series against the Braves:
“Before that game…I’m scared to death. I know I have no chance. Feeling the pressure of all that, right before the game I get a bottle of vodka. I just started drinking vodka. Low and behold, it kind of tamed the monster, and I was able to do what I wanted. I’m sitting on the bench feeling crazy I have to drink vodka to pitch through this. It worked for that game. (I had never drank before a game before). It was one of those things like the yipps, the monster, the disease…it didn’t fight fair so I felt like I wasn’t going to fight fair either.”
Imagine spending your whole life getting to the pinnacle of your career. Then imagine it immediately disintegrating. And then imagine having to go out and do it again in front of millions. It’s almost impossible for anyone to contemplate and, as such, it’s hard to judge almost anything Ankiel did in response to that when he was 21 years-old. That Ankiel got through that and made a career for himself is absolutely amazing. It’s a testament to his drive and determination.
A couple of weeks ago our president wrote one of his more . . . vexing tweets. He was talking about immigration when he whipped out the phrase . . . “Easy D”:
No one was quite sure what he meant by Easy D. Was it the older brother of N.W.A.’s founder? The third sequel to that Emma Stone movie from a few years back? So many questions!
Baseball Twitter had fun with it, though, with a lot of people wondering how they could work it in casually to their commentary:
It wasn’t a scout who did it, but twelve days after that, a player obliged Mr. McCullough:
I have no more idea what Turner was talking about with that than Trump was. We’ll have to wait for the full story in the L.A. Times. But I am going to assume Turner was doing McCullough a solid with that one rather than commenting on the president’s tweet. Either way, I’m glad he made the effort.
And before you ask: yes, it’s a slow news day.