The World Champion Philadelphia Phillies dropped four games to the Houston freakin’ Astros this weekend, and Charlie Manuel was not at all pleased:
“I hear some of them talking, saying we’re a team that plays better when we have to. [Expletive] the last couple years. What the hell? That don’t mean [expletive]. Last year is dead and gone. We play for today . . .When I get up in the morning, I feel good. When the game is over, the last four, five days, I haven’t felt too damn good.”
One of those losses came on yet another Brad Lidge blown save. Apparently Manuel doesn’t want to [expletive] the part of last year that had Lidge’s name written down in permanent marker as the closer, however, because Manuel appears to be sticking with him.
The Phillies have lost eight of 13, mostly it seems, due to bad hitting, not poor pitching. But if Manuel is going to shake this team up — and he certainly sounds like he wants to — maybe throwing some bats into the shower, demoting Brad Lidge and showing everyone that they can be replaced if they don’t step it the [expletive] up is the best way to do it.
Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.
The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.
Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.
Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”