What They're Saying About Manny and Ortiz

Leave a comment

The news has only been out a couple of hours, but the blogosphere, she already rumbles:

Tom Tango at The Book Blog: Redsox
Nation will defend him, the others who want to fight will villify him,
and even those Redsox fans who are bothered by it will simply hold
their noses as they cling to the dream of a clean ring. The rest of us
who don’t cling to the idea that baseball is a virgin to be protected
at all costs will shake our heads for a second and move on in peace,
while leaving the battlefield to those too holy for us.

It’s About the Money: There’s
a part of me that should really be happy that another player from the
RedSox has been outted, but really, it’s just another gut-punch to
baseball. Sure, there might be some of you (myself included), that
might jump up and say: “See, THAT explains it all!” Except it doesn’t.
Every team was dirty. Some more than others. But to think assume that
your favorite player(s) are clean is just folly.

Bronx Banter: Nothing shocking here.

Over the Monster: If
this is true about Ortiz, it is a real shocker. I’m not surprised about
Manny, but with Ortiz it goes back to everything he was saying. He said
he was clean, he said he never did anything illegal. I think we all
believed him. Of course with his struggles this season, it may have
said, “hey, I’m off the juice,” but how are we supposed to know? If
this is true, this is quite sad.

The Big Lead: Wonder
if Ortiz wishes he could take back this quote from February: “I think
you clean up the game by the testing. I test you, you test positive,
you’re going to be out. Period.” What a fraud. Nobody should be
surprised that Ortiz and Ramirez tested positive.

Rob Neyer: When
Ortiz said players who fail drug tests should be suspended for a whole
season, he actually meant, “Anybody who gets caught now should be
severely punished not for using drugs, but for being stupid enough to
get caught.”

Fire Brand of the American League: In
my experiences watching baseball, Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez were
of shady character enough that it was easy enough to see and believe
they had taken steroids illegally and knowingly. I don’t have that
sense about Ortiz. It’s possible he’s crafted an outstanding, fake
public image and he’s not the person we all thought he was, but I’m not
cynical enough for that. I think right now, David Ortiz deserves my not
rushing to judgment. Not based on all these home runs he’s hit for the
Sox, but for what he says and what he stands for.

Bugs & Cranks: I’m
not going to pretend otherwise: I believe this report. Deep down, I
knew this day would probably come. Too many stars on too many teams
were taken down with the Red Sox managing to dodge most of the bullets.
Then when Manny tested positive, I knew it was probably when not if.
But I didn’t want to believe it. I still don’t. Ortiz? On steroids?
F*CK.

Mike Herz, NJ.com: It’s
time people accepted just how pervasive performance enhancing use has
been in the game (going back to amphetamine use starting in the ’60s),
to the point of defining the game over much of the last two decades.
With each new big name that comes out, it becomes harder to chastise,
because it’s more of an indictment of an entire era rather than an
individual. It’s becoming exceedingly clear that juicing was not
isolated to a small group of “cheaters,” but something that was
commonly practiced and accepted throughout baseball as part of the job.

Obviously a ton more out there, but this covers the bases of the
immediate reaction. Sox fans are sad and surprised, Yankees fans are
not surprised, but are withholding the “ha-has!”, and smart people
everywhere are starting to acknowledge that steroids is way too
complicated and pervasive a problem to allow us to live in a fantasy
land in which there are “cheaters” and “clean people.”

Your 2016 Winter Meetings Wrapup

national-harbor
Gaylord National Resort
3 Comments

OXON HILL, MD — The 2016 Winter Meetings are over.  As usual, there was still no shortage of excitement this year. More trades than we’ve seen in the past even if there are still a lot of free agents on the market. Whatever the case, it should make the rest of December a bit less sleepy than it normally is.

Let’s look back at what went down here at National Harbor this week:

Well, that certainly was a lot! I hope our coverage was useful for you as baseball buzzed through its most frantic week of the offseason. And I hope you continue coming back here to keep abreast of everything happening in Major League Baseball.

Now, get me to an airport and back home.

Eighteen players selected in the Rule 5 Draft

rule-5
MLB
17 Comments

OXON HILL, MD — The Rule 5 Draft just went down here at National Harbor. As always, it was the last event of the Winter Meetings. As usual, you likely don’t know most of the players selected in the Draft, even if a couple may make a splash one day in the future.

In all, 18 players were taken in the Major League phase of the Rule 5. Here they are, with the name of the team which selected them:

Round 1
1. Twins:  Miguel Diaz, RHP, Brewers
2. Reds: Luis Torrens, C, Yankees
3. Padres: Allen Cordoba, SS, Cardinals
4. Rays: Kevin Gadea, Mariners
5. Braves: Armando Rivero, RHP, Cubs
6. D-backs: Tyler Jones, RHP, Yankees
7. Brewers: Caleb Smith, LHP, Yankees
8. Angels  Justin Haley,RHP, Red Sox
9. White Sox:  Dylan Covey, RHP, A’s
10. Pirates: Tyler Webb, LHP, Yankees
11. Tigers: Daniel Stumpf, LHP, Royals
12. Orioles: Aneury Tavarez, 2B, Red Sox
13. Blue Jays: Glenn Sparkman, RHP, Royals
14. Red Sox: Josh Rutledge, INF, Rockies
15. Indians: Holby Miller, LHP, Phillies
16. Rangers: Michael Hauschild, RHP, Astros

Round 2
17. Reds:  Stuart Turner, C, Twins
18. Orioles:  Anthony Santander, OF, Indians

For a breakdown of most of these guys and their big league prospects, check this story out at Baseball America. Like I said, you don’t know most of these guys. And, while there have been some notable exceptions in Rule 5 Draft history, most won’t make a splash in the big leagues.

Each player cost their selecting team $100,000. Each player must remain on the 25-man roster of his new club for the entire season or, at the very least, on the disabled list. If he is removed from the 25-man, the team which selected him has to offer him back to his old team for a nominal fee. Sort of like a stocking fee when you return a mattress or something. Many of these guys, of course, will not be returned and, instead, will be stashed on the DL with phantom injuries.

Aren’t transactions grand?