Reds discuss deal for Rolen, for some reason

Leave a comment

Okay, so imagine yourself as the general manager of a team that is
currently seven games out of the division lead (behind four other
teams) and eight-and-a-half games out of the wild card (behind eight
other teams). Might be time to wise up and cut bait on expensive
veterans, right? Not if you are Reds general manager Walt Jocketty.
According to Jon Paul Morosi of FoxSports.com, the Reds are discussing a trade for third baseman Scott Rolen:

The Reds, who have lost five straight games, are widely expected to
sell at the deadline. But acquiring Rolen would give the team a head
start on planning for 2010, since Rolen is already under contract for
next year at $11 million.

The sides are still trying to determine which players would head to
Toronto in the deal, but the source said that third baseman Edwin
Encarnacion would be included.

I’m not going to sit here and tell you that the Reds would be better
off with Edwin Encarnacion manning third base. They wouldn’t. He’s
awful over there. One of the worst in the sport, even. And Rolen has
been a great comeback story this season, putting together an awesome
.316/.371/.467 line. But why take the $11 million risk for a player in
his mid-30s, who isn’t the Gold Glover he used to be, and with a
well-documented injury history to boot? Well, Jocketty is a fan of
Rolen from their days together in St. Louis; the veteran third baseman
fits the bill as the righty bat the Reds have been seeking.

Wouldn’t you know it, Encarnacion is also right-handed and under the
organization’s control through 2012. He will make just $4.7 million in
2010. If the Reds are truly that unhappy with Encarnacion’s defense,
they would be better served to move him to a corner outfield spot. They
shouldn’t give up on a relatively inexpensive 26-year-old with real
30-homer potential who is showing some tangible progress in his
approach (15.7% walk rate this season) at the plate.

Report: Mets have discussed a Matt Harvey trade with at least two teams

Al Bello/Getty Images
2 Comments

Kristie Ackert of the New York Daily News reports that the Mets have discussed a trade involving starter Matt Harvey with at least two teams. Apparently, the Mets were even willing to move Harvey for a reliever.

The Mets tendered Harvey a contract on December 1. He’s entering his third and final year of arbitration eligibility and will likely see a slight bump from last season’s salary of $5.125 million. As a result, there was some thought going into late November that the Mets would non-tender Harvey.

Harvey, 28, made 18 starts and one relief appearance last year and had horrendous results. He put up a 6.70 ERA with a 67/47 K/BB ratio in 92 2/3 innings. Between his performance, his impending free agency, and his injury history, the Mets aren’t likely to get much back in return for Harvey. Even expecting a reliever in return may be too lofty.

Along with bullpen help, the Mets also need help at second base, first base, and the outfield. They don’t have many resources with which to address those needs. Ackert described the Mets’ resources as “a very limited stash of prospects” and “limited payroll space.”