As expected the Red Sox dropped Julio Lugo from the roster this afternoon by designating him for assignment, which means that they have 10 days to either trade or release him.
Finding a trade partner is still possible if the Red Sox are willing to
eat nearly all of Lugo’s remaining contract, which pays him $9 million
this season and another $9 million in 2010. He’s hitting reasonably
well at .284/.352/.367 and his lack of range following knee surgery
would be less of an issue with a move to second base, but at this point
an outright release seems more likely.
Jed Lowrie is set to come off the disabled list tomorrow after missing
three months following wrist surgery, so he’ll take over at shortstop
with Nick Green moving into the utility man role that best suits his
skills. Signed to a four-year, $36 million deal in December of 2006,
Lugo ended up hitting .251/.319/.346 while rating 6.1 runs below average defensively and sitting out 35 percent of the Red Sox’s games.
Last year Pete Rose field a defamation lawsuit against attorney John Dowd after Dowd gave a radio interview in which he said that Rose had sexual relations with underage girls that amounted to “statutory rape, every time.” Today Rose dismissed the suit.
In a statement issued by Rose’s lawyer and Dowd’s lawyer, the parties say they agreed “based on mutual consideration, to the dismissal with prejudice of Mr. Rose’s lawsuit against Mr. Dowd.” They say they can’t comment further.
Dowd, of course, is the man who conducted the investigation into Rose’s gambling which resulted in the Hit King being placed on baseball’s permanently ineligible list back in 1989. The two have sparred through the media sporadically over the years, with Rose disputing Dowd’s findings despite agreeing to his ban back in 1989. Rose has changed his story about his gambling many times, usually when he had an opportunity to either make money off of it, like when he wrote his autobiography, or when he sought, unsuccessfully, to be reinstated to baseball. Dowd has stood by his report ever since it was released.
In the wake of Dowd’s radio comments in 2015, a woman came forward to say that she and Rose had a sexual relationship when she was under the age of 16, seemingly confirming Dowd’s assertion and forming the basis for a strong defense of Rose’s claims (truth is a total defense to a defamation claim). They seem now, however, to have buried the hatchet. Or at least buried the litigation.
That leaves Dowd more free time to defend his latest client, President Trump. And Rose more time to do whatever it is Pete Rose does with his time.