Stephen Strasburg: "I haven't heard from the Nationals"

Leave a comment

That sound you hear is either the Nats screwing up the most important
thing in the history of their franchise or Scott Boras screwing up
Stephen Strasburg’s career. Hard to tell which it is, really. Tom Boswell, who caught up with Strasburg in St. Louis yesterday, has the scoop:

Strasburg said that “I haven’t heard from the Nationals” since he
was drafted, other than receiving a minor league contract — a
technicality that prevents him from becoming a free agent . . .
Strasburg seemed a bit perplexed by the lack of communication since the
signing deadline is Aug. 17 and many other Nats draft picks are already
under contract.

Accordng to Nats’ president Stan Kasten, however, acting GM Mike Rizzo
has been in “frequent contact” with Scott Boras. Which suggests either
(a) that contact has been highly superficial, to the point where Boras
isn’t even telling Stasburg about it; or (b) there have been
substantive talks and that Boras, in violation of just about any
ethical rule you can think of, isn’t keeping his client in the loop.
When it comes to that guy your guess is as good as mine.

As Boswell notes, any team dealing with Boras and a high pick can
expect him to make a big public show of it being insulted by the first
offer, thus the caution. If I’m running the Nats, however, I try to
short circuit all of that. I pick a number which I will truly not go
beyond in signing Strasburg — no lowballing, no gamesmanship — just a
number that I can tolerate as an owner but which I will not pay a penny
beyond. Then I offer it. Politely, of course, with respect and all of
that, while making clear — in writing — just how generous it is in
light of every other deal every other draftee has ever signed. If he
takes it, great. I have improved my team and signed the guy I wanted to
sign at a price I know I can tolerate.

And if he doesn’t take it? Well, in that case you can be assured that Boras will be talking through one of his favorite sock puppets
all about it, publicly slamming the Nats. In response I would release
the writing, note that we thought it was a fair offer, and wish
Strasburg the best of luck and health in the Independent Leagues. If he
doesn’t blow out his elbow, I draft him again next year with my
compensation pick.

Maybe such an approach will cause the Nats to overpay by a couple of
million. But if they do it right they will not be paying more than they
feel good judgment requires, they will circumvent a stupid and
pointless Boras negotiation, they will show the fans that they aren’t
being pennywise and pound foolish and, best of all, they stand a pretty
good chance of getting Stephen Strasburg signed and pitching before the
end of the summer.

Take Boras’ power away from him, Rizzo. Make him an offer he can, but shouldn’t, refuse.

A-Rod to host a reality show featuring broke ex-athletes

NEW YORK, NY - AUGUST 12: Alex Rodriguez #13 of the New York Yankees answers question in a press conference after the game against the Tampa Bay Rays at Yankee Stadium on August 12, 2016 in New York City. (Photo by Drew Hallowell/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

Alex Rodriguez’s transition into retirement has featured a serious move into the business world. He has gone back to school, worked seriously on investments and has started his own corporation. Yes, he’s set for life after making more money than any baseball player in history, but even if his bank account wasn’t fat, you get the sense that he’d be OK given what we’ve seen of his work ethic and savvy in recent years.

He’s going to be getting another paycheck soon, though. For hosting a reality show featuring athletes who are not in as good a financial shape as A-Rod is:

Interesting. Hopefully, like so many other reality shows featuring the formerly rich and famous, this one is not exploitative. Not gonna hold my breath because that’s what that genre is all about, unfortunately, but here’s hoping A-Rod can help some folks with this.

Great Moments in Not Understanding The Rules

screen-shot-2017-01-17-at-10-02-33-am
6 Comments

Bill Livingston of the Cleveland Plain Dealer is a Hall of Fame voter. In the past he has voted for players who used PEDs, but he’s never been totally happy with it, seeing the whole PED mess as a dilemma for voters.

On the one hand he doesn’t like voting for users and doesn’t like harming those who were clean by shifting votes away from them, but on the other hand, he doesn’t want to pretend history didn’t happen and that baseball hasn’t been filled with cheaters forever. What to do?

This year he decided to abstain altogether. A fair and noble act if one is as conflicted as Livingston happens to be. Except . . . he didn’t actually abstain:

Major league baseball will confer bronzed immortality on a few players Wednesday when the results of the national baseball writers’ balloting for the Hall of Fame will be announced.

I had a 2017 ballot. I returned it signed, but blank, with an explanatory note.

A blank ballot, signed and submitted, is not an abstention. It’s counted as a vote for no one. Each “no” vote increases the denominator in the calculation of whether or not a candidate has received 75% of the vote and has gained induction. An abstention, however, would not. So, in effect, Livingston has voted against all of the players on the ballot, both PED-tainted and clean, even though it appears that that was not his intention.

This is the second time in three years a Cleveland writer has had . . . issues with his Hall of Fame ballot. In the 2014-15 voting period, Paul Hoynes simply lost his ballot. Now Livingston misunderstood how to abstain.

I worry quite often that Ohio is gonna mess up a major election. I guess I’m just worrying about the wrong election.