Even though there was no financial incentive for doing so, the Jays
opted to release former closer B.J. Ryan on Wednesday. The move comes
after Ryan gave up three runs in two-thirds of an inning against the
Yankees on Sunday. It was the only appearance he had made this month.
While his stuff still hadn’t come back, Ryan had a 1.04 ERA in 8 2/3
innings during June. Left-handers were hitting .250 with one homer in
36 at-bats against him. Walks were a big problem, but he’s not totally
useless now and there’s still a real chance that he’ll regain some
It’d be a less surprising move if Ryan wasn’t so good when healthy
during his time with the Jays. After securing a big five-year, $47
million deal to take over as Toronto’s closer, he had the best season
of his career in 2006, posting a 1.37 ERA and 38 saves in 42
opportunities. After a 2007 season ruined by Tommy John surgery, he
came back last year and finished with a 2.95 ERA and 32 saves in 36
opportunities. Even with this year’s struggles factored in, he
converted 86 percent of his save chances for the Blue Jays.
More than his command problems, it was Ryan’s diminished stuff that seemed to sour the Jays on him. According to Baseball Info Solutions data,
Ryan’s average fastball bad dropped from 90.7 mph in 2007 to 88.9 last
year and 87.3 this year. His slider had fallen just as far (84.7 to
82.5 to 81.2), and since he was no longer able to get his fastball past
hitters, he was relying on the slider more and more.
I can’t help but believe there’s some behind-the-scenes stuff going
on here. The Jays had two other quality left-handed relievers in Scott
Downs and Jesse Carlson, so Ryan wasn’t going to be very useful if
reduced to a specialist role. But that still wasn’t a very good reason
to release him with a year and a half left on his deal. It’s entirely
possible that he’ll sort out his delivery and reemerge as an above
average reliever and maybe a closer next year. That the Jays chose to
let him go now suggests that he rubbed somebody the wrong way. He
couldn’t have been happy about his reduced role. He had pitched just
once in the last week, and he wasn’t given a chance to win back the
closer’s role even with Downs sidelined.
On Monday we passed along a report that Major League Baseball and the MLBPA are negotiating over an international draft. That report — from ESPN’s Buster Olney — cited competitive balance and the well-being of international free agents as the reasons why they’re pushing for the draft.
We have long doubted those stated motivations and said so again in our post on Monday. But we’re just armchair skeptics when it comes to this. Ben Badler of Baseball America is an expert. Perhaps the foremost expert on international baseball, international signings and the like. Today he writes about a would-be international draft and he tears MLB, the MLBPA and their surrogates in the media to shreds with respect to their talking points.
Of course Badler is a nice guy so “tearing to shreds” is probably putting it too harshly. Maybe it’s better to say that he systematically dismantles the stated rationale for the international draft and makes plan what’s really going on: MLB is looking to save money and the players are looking to sell out non-union members to further their own bargaining position:
Major League Baseball has long wanted an international draft. The driving force behind implementing an international draft is for owners to control their labor costs by paying less money to international amateur players, allowing owners to keep more of that money . . . the players’ association doesn’t care about international amateur players as anything more than a bargaining chip. It’s nothing discriminatory against foreign players, it’s just that the union looks out for players on 40-man rosters. So international players, draft picks in the United States and minor leaguers who make less than $10,000 in annual salary get their rights sold out by the union, which in exchange can negotiate items like a higher major league minimum salary, adjustments to the Super 2 rules or modifying draft pick compensation attached to free agent signings.
Badler then walks through the process of how players are discovered, scouted and signed in Latin America and explains, quite convincingly, how MLB’s international draft and, indeed, its fundamental approach to amateurs in Latin America is lacking.
Read this. Then, every time a U.S.-based writer with MLB sources talks about the international draft, ask whether they know something Ben Badler doesn’t or, alternatively, whether they’re carrying water for either the league or the union.
I don’t know why Bill Murray is in Washington today. I don’t know why he’s at the White House. But I do know that he was there in Chicago Cubs gear, standing at the lectern in the press briefing room, voicing his full confidence in the Cubs prevailing in the NLCS, despite the fact that Clayton Kershaw is going for the Dodgers tomorrow night.
“Too many sticks,” president Murray said of the Cubs lineup. And something about better trees in Illinois.
Four. More. Years.