To use PEDs or not to use PEDs: a cost benefit analysis with math and everything

Leave a comment

Catherine Rampell of the New York Times’ “Economix” blog has a post up attempting to quantify the cost-benefit analysis that goes into a baseball player’s choice to use PEDs
or not and speculates about how the system can be re-jiggered so as to
further disincentivize drug use. Anyone who has thought about this
stuff for any length of time is aware of the general arguments even if
they haven’t done any of the actual math, but it’s probably worth a
read anyway. The best quote, though, is an aside about the assumptions
that go into her equations:

Now these numbers are obviously all made up (and no one gets signed
to $10 million deals off the street, I imagine). And players surely
care about things other than their paycheck — love of the game, fans,
Cooperstown, etc.

That sound you hear is Scott Boras firing off an angry letter to the
New York Times’ editor telling him just how wrong Ms. Rampell is about
all of those things.

Pete Rose dismisses his defamation lawsuit against John Dowd

Getty Images
4 Comments

Last year Pete Rose field a defamation lawsuit against attorney John Dowd after Dowd gave a radio interview in which he said that Rose had sexual relations with underage girls that amounted to “statutory rape, every time.” Today Rose dismissed the suit.

In a statement issued by Rose’s lawyer and Dowd’s lawyer, the parties say they agreed “based on mutual consideration, to the dismissal with prejudice of Mr. Rose’s lawsuit against Mr. Dowd.” They say they can’t comment further.

Dowd, of course, is the man who conducted the investigation into Rose’s gambling which resulted in the Hit King being placed on baseball’s permanently ineligible list back in 1989. The two have sparred through the media sporadically over the years, with Rose disputing Dowd’s findings despite agreeing to his ban back in 1989. Rose has changed his story about his gambling many times, usually when he had an opportunity to either make money off of it, like when he wrote his autobiography, or when he sought, unsuccessfully, to be reinstated to baseball. Dowd has stood by his report ever since it was released.

In the wake of Dowd’s radio comments in 2015, a woman came forward to say that she and Rose had a sexual relationship when she was under the age of 16, seemingly confirming Dowd’s assertion and forming the basis for a strong defense of Rose’s claims (truth is a total defense to a defamation claim). They seem now, however, to have buried the hatchet. Or at least buried the litigation.

That leaves Dowd more free time to defend his latest client, President Trump. And Rose more time to do whatever it is Pete Rose does with his time.