Following Magglio Ordonez’s “indefinite” benching on Thursday, it didn’t take long for his agent Scott Boras to chime in, insinuating that the move had more to do with his $18 million option for 2010 than his poor start:
“Great major league players have
periods where they don’t perform well. It’s befuddling to me, why
they’ve done this. The Tigers are treating Magglio Ordonez differently
than they have in the past. Coming off three consecutive years when he
played really well for them … this is unheard of.”
It would be one thing if Ordonez was performing somewhat close to the
same level of the past three seasons, but he’s batting an anemic
.272/.347/.343 with two homers and 22 RBI through his first 216
at-bats. He’s currently slugging at a lower rate than Coco Crisp and
teammate Placido Polanco. Once a hero of the 2006 ALCS, the 35-year-old hasn’t gone deep in 38 games.
Jim Leyland publicly defended the move on Saturday, responding to Boras by saying:
“This is about no other issue. This
is about Magglio Ordonez and trying to get him right so he can
contribute the way he feels good about himself, because, by his own
admission, he’s embarrassed.”
“I’m very respectful of Scott Boras,
but I’m not going to listen to his (nonsense). Scott Boras might be
better off if he lets Magglio and myself handle this instead of him.”
Ordonez’s struggles are a convenient excuse to bench him, no doubt, but
the best solution for all involved may just be going the “the Gary
Sheffield route” by cutting him loose.
Vote in our poll and let us know what you think.
Jon Heyman reports that the Cardinals do not plan to exercise Matt Holliday‘s $17 million option for 2017.
And, not surprisingly, will not extend him a similarly priced qualifying offer, either.
Holliday will be 37 when spring training begins and he is finishing his worst season as a major leaguer, having hit .242/.318/.450 with 19 homers over 424 plate appearances.
Injuries have not helped him — he’s missed the last six weeks with a fractured thumb — but it’s not like guys het healthier the older they get. Holliday will likely be looking at a massive pay cut for next year and a competition to make an Opening Day roster.
The Blue Jays are poised to make the playoffs for the second year in a row and are playing a critical series with the Orioles, the outcome of which will likely determine who gets to play at home for that one-and-done game next week. Big stakes! Must keep focused!
Or, alternatively, maybe it’s time to have a silly, juvenile feud with the press. Here’s Steve Buffery of the Toronto Sun, asking why the Jays are doing stuff like this while fighting for the playoffs:
Why, for example, would the leaders on the team allow someone to put up on a wall photos of two Toronto sports writers with an ‘X’ scratched on their face and the a message written on top reading, ‘Do not grant them interviews’ (or words to that effect)? . . . Things like: Someone cranking up the music just when the media arrives to conduct pre-game interviews.
Not that the Jays have been treated wonderfully by the press themselves:
There was an incident the other night when a couple of journalists tried to corral struggling closer Roberto Osuna for an interview, but he kept blowing them off. Finally, one reporter followed him right into a private part of the clubhouse and told him off.
That’s . . . not what you’re supposed to do.
Still, there is zero point to get into silly feuds with the media. If they overstep their bounds, there are a TON of Jays officials and, I suspect, newspaper editors, who will quickly and eagerly discipline the reporter. You don’t have to make wanted posters and act like children. Partially because it’s just a bad look. But also, because it leads to news stories about it like the one in the Toronto Sun.