Two stories about how the Red Sox missed out on getting Mark Teixeira this past offseason, one in the Boston Globe:
. . . come the end of this season, particularly if the Red Sox fail
to retain Jason Bay, the Yankees’ signing of Teixeira at the Red Sox’
expense could loom as a pivotal turning point in baseball’s fiercest
division . . . [Teixeira] might have been the centerpiece of the Boston
lineup for years to come. Given the struggles of Ortiz, the Sox’
failure to sign Teixeira now leaves them with something of a long-term
And one in the New York Times, which ties it specifically to the Sox-Yanks rivalry, with the headline “Teixeira Altered Dynamics of Red Sox-Yankees Rivalry.”
The question caused Alex Rodriguez to put his palms on the side of
his head, smile and utter, “Wow.” It was Rodriguez’s animated,
one-syllable response to how dramatically different the rivalry between
the Yankees and the Red Sox would have been if Mark Teixeira had signed
with Boston . . . The Red Sox positioned their off-season around
signing Teixeira, a player who would have fit snugly into their desire
for shrewd, patient hitters who play stellar defense. If the Red Sox
were assigned the task of building the perfect player, they would have
constructed someone who hit, fielded, walked and talked like Teixeira.
Only brief mention of the facts that (a) The Sox have yet to lose to
the Yankees this year, so the dynamics haven’t been altered that
much; (b) that the Red Sox have a really good first base prospect in
Lars Anderson; and (c) even if Anderson doesn’t pan out, it’s been a
very long time since the Red Sox were a team that allowed itself to
have gaping holes anywhere. If Bay bolts, they’ll find a way to patch
the holes and will remain competitive. That’s just what they do. So
yes, having Mark Teixeira in Boston would have changed things a bit,
but I think it’s really easy to oversell this storyline. They’ll find
someone else. They always do.
But hey, the Yankees are playing the Red Sox this week, and overselling everything that goes with that is part of the territory.
The Associated Press is reporting that the Cubs and starter Jake Arrieta have avoided arbitration, agreeing to a $10.7 million salary for the 2016 season. That marks the highest salary on a one-year deal for a pitcher with four years of service, the AP notes. Arrieta and the Cubs were set to go before an independent arbitrator but now can simply focus on the season ahead.
Arrieta, 29, is in his second of three years of arbitration eligibility. He had filed for $13 million while the Cubs countered at $7.5 million. The $5.5 million gap was the largest among players who did not come to terms with their respective teams by the January deadline. The $10.7 million salary is $450,000 above the midpoint between the two submitted figures.
Arrieta won the National League Cy Young Award for his performance this past season, narrowly edging out Zack Greinke, then with the Dodgers. Arrieta led the majors with 22 wins, four complete games, and three shutouts. With that, he compiled a 1.77 ERA and a 236/48 K/BB ratio across 229 innings.
Once a top prospect in the Orioles’ minor league system, Arrieta struggled in the majors but found immediate success with the Cubs in 2013 after the O’s traded him along with Pedro Strop in exchange for Steve Clevenger and Scott Feldman.
Per Baseball America’s Matt Eddy, the Giants have signed infielder Conor Gillaspie to a minor league deal. Gillaspie was selected by the Giants in the supplemental round of the 2008 draft, then was traded to the White Sox in February 2013.
Gillaspie, 28, hit a meager .228/.269/.359 with four home runs and 24 RBI in 253 plate appearances between the White Sox and Angels during the 2015 season. Almost all of his playing time has come at third base but he can also play first base if needed.
The Giants, thin on depth, will allow Gillaspie to audition in spring training for a spot on the 25-man roster.
Jon Morosi of FOX Sports reports that free agent reliever Joe Nathan, recovering from Tommy John surgery, plans to pitch in 2016 according to his agent Dave Pepe. According to Pepe, Nathan’s workouts are “going well” and the right-hander is “definitely planning on playing this year.”
Nathan, 41, got the final out on Opening Day (April 6) against the Twins before going on the disabled list with a flexor strain in his right elbow, causing him to miss the next 161 games. He will likely be able to contribute out of the bullpen in late May or early June if he has no setbacks. On a minor league deal or incentive-laden major league deal, Nathan could make for a low-risk gamble.
Over a 15-season career that dates back to 1999 (he did not pitch in the majors in 2001 or 2010), Nathan has 377 saves with a 2.89 ERA and a 967/340 K/BB ratio over 917 innings.
On Thursday, we learned that the Diamondbacks were still considering free agent reliever Tyler Clippard. You can add the Rays to the list as well, per Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times.
The Rays traded lefty reliever Jake McGee to the Rockies in exchange for outfielder Corey Dickerson in late January, so Clippard would be able to slot right in behind closer Brad Boxberger. Clippard, 30, compiled a 2.92 ERA with 64 strikeouts and 31 walks over 71 innings in a season split between the Athletics and Mets. The strikeout rate was at its lowest since the right-hander become a full-time reliever in 2009, and his walk rate was at its highest since 2010, which may be a factor in his still being a free agent in February.