Teixeira not critical to Boston's future

Leave a comment

Two stories about how the Red Sox missed out on getting Mark Teixeira this past offseason, one in the Boston Globe:

. . . come the end of this season, particularly if the Red Sox fail
to retain Jason Bay, the Yankees’ signing of Teixeira at the Red Sox’
expense could loom as a pivotal turning point in baseball’s fiercest
division . . . [Teixeira] might have been the centerpiece of the Boston
lineup for years to come. Given the struggles of Ortiz, the Sox’
failure to sign Teixeira now leaves them with something of a long-term
predicament offensively.

And one in the New York Times, which ties it specifically to the Sox-Yanks rivalry, with the headline “Teixeira Altered Dynamics of Red Sox-Yankees Rivalry.”

The question caused Alex Rodriguez to put his palms on the side of
his head, smile and utter, “Wow.” It was Rodriguez’s animated,
one-syllable response to how dramatically different the rivalry between
the Yankees and the Red Sox would have been if Mark Teixeira had signed
with Boston . . . The Red Sox positioned their off-season around
signing Teixeira, a player who would have fit snugly into their desire
for shrewd, patient hitters who play stellar defense. If the Red Sox
were assigned the task of building the perfect player, they would have
constructed someone who hit, fielded, walked and talked like Teixeira.

Only brief mention of the facts that (a) The Sox have yet to lose to
the Yankees this year, so the dynamics haven’t been altered that
much; (b) that the Red Sox have a really good first base prospect in
Lars Anderson; and (c) even if Anderson doesn’t pan out, it’s been a
very long time since the Red Sox were a team that allowed itself to
have gaping holes anywhere. If Bay bolts, they’ll find a way to patch
the holes and will remain competitive. That’s just what they do. So
yes, having Mark Teixeira in Boston would have changed things a bit,
but I think it’s really easy to oversell this storyline. They’ll find
someone else. They always do.

But hey, the Yankees are playing the Red Sox this week, and overselling everything that goes with that is part of the territory.

Magic Johnson to take over the Lakers, but will still be part of Dodgers ownership

CHICAGO, IL - OCTOBER 15:  Earvin 'Magic' Johnson attends game one of the National League Championship Series between the Chicago Cubs and the Los Angeles Dodgers at Wrigley Field on October 15, 2016 in Chicago, Illinois.  (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

This is more significant for basketball fans than baseball fans, but Magic Johnson is taking over basketball operations for the Los Angeles Lakers. Dan Feldman over at PBT has the full story on that.

For our purposes, you probably know that Johnson is part of the Dodgers ownership group. Anthony McCullough of the L.A. Times got comment from the Dodgers, saying that despite his new full-time job, his status with the Dodgers will be unchanged:

Maybe I’m alone in this, but I’m not entirely certain what Magic does with the Lakers, so the first clause in Kasten’s comment may be doing most of the heavy lifting here.

Matt Wieters is close to signing with the Washington Nationals

NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 02: Matt Wieters #32 of the Baltimore Orioles connects on a two-run home run in the fourth inning against the New York Yankees at Yankee Stadium on October 2, 2016 in the Bronx borough of New York City.  (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)
Getty Images
4 Comments

Jon Heyman reports that the Nationals are closing in on a deal with catcher Matt Wieters. Joel Sherman of the New York Post reports that it’s a two-year deal. UPDATE: Ken Rosenthal reports that the deal is for two years, at $21 million. There is an opt-out for him after year one. He will get $10 million in 2017 and, if he returns in 2018, he’ll get $11 million.

Wieters was not expected to go this long without signing, but his market, which many thought would be robust, never materialized. The Nats had been rumored to be interested for months, but they were apparently waiting to swoop in late and get what one presumes will be a bargain.

Wieters, 30, finished last season hitting .243/.302/.409 with 17 home runs and 66 RBI in 464 plate appearances. The Nationals currently have Derek Norris and Jose Lobaton, so who falls where in the catcher fight in Washington is unclear, but one presumes that Wieters getting a two-year deal puts him at the top of the depth chart.