First Impressions of Citi Field

Leave a comment

I made the trek up the East Coast this weekend to see the Mets’ road
spring training lineup take on Josh Johnson and the Marlins. With the
exception of Fernando Martinez’s first hit, double and RBI, there
wasn’t much to crow about as the Marlins won the game handily 7-3.
However, Saturday marked my first chance to catch a game at Citi Field.
So besides telling you that braving the line at Shake Shack is worth
it, here are a couple initial impressions which may or may not be
original thoughts.

1) The Fanwalk is cool: In
2007, fans had an opportunity to purchase engraved bricks with a
customized message that would sit on the plaza outside the entrance to
the Jackie Robinson Rotunda. I had no idea how cool this would be until
I saw it and now I regret not getting one. For a stadium that is
largely a building at this point and not a “Mets” building, the brick
walkway puts a real personal touch on the history of the franchise and
their fans.

2) The Jackie Robinson Rotunda is underwhelming:
I’m all for Jackie Robinson. Aside from Michael Jordan, he was my
favorite person to write a biography about in elementary school. I
completely understand the impact he has had on our game, but the
grandiosity of the rotunda was lost on me. Do you really want the first
thing people see when they walk in a Mets’ ballpark to be a person in a
Dodgers’ uniform? Where’s the Mark Carreon Rotunda? Give me some
history! The whole thing left me feeling cold.

3) Lack of foul territory:
Sure there are the obvious quirks of the fences, cut-outs and all, and
The Pepsi Porch that hangs over the playing field, which is where I
sat, but there is considerably less foul territory here as opposed to
Shea Stadium. It’s one thing to see it on television, but it’s hard to
feel the gravity of it until seeing it in person. For all the talk
about this being a pitchers’ park, opposing batters will certainly get
a few extra swings here. I suppose it counter-balances in some weird
way. As for down the lines, I can’t wait to see a “Bartman moment” in
this place. It’s bound to happen. You know, probably on October 4th
against the Astros with the Phillies and Mets deadlocked in first

Mariners trying to trade Mark Trumbo by Wednesday

Mark Trumbo

Seattle making Mark Trumbo available has been known for a while now, but Bob Dutton of the Tacoma News Tribune reports that the Mariners are trying to trade the first baseman/outfielder before Wednesday.

That’s the deadline to tender 2016 contracts to arbitration eligible players and with Trumbo set to make around $9 million via that process the Mariners would rather move on before any decision needs to be made. In other words: They don’t want to be stuck with him.

Trumbo has elite power, averaging 30 homers per 160 games for his career, but that power comes with a .250 batting average, poor plate discipline and a .299 on-base percentage, and sub par defense. Mariners general manager Jerry Dipoto has already traded Trumbo once, dealing him to the Diamondbacks back when he was the Angels’ general manager, and now he’s working hard to part ways again.

Ken Rosenthal of reports that the Rockies are among the interested teams.

UPDATE: Red Sox sign outfielder Chris Young to a two-year, $13 million deal

Chris Young Getty

UPDATE: Ken Rosenthal reports that Young will receive a two-year, $13 million contract from the Red Sox.

Monday, 1:47 PM: Veteran outfielder Chris Young thrived in a platoon role for the Yankees this past season and now he’s headed to the rival Red Sox to fill a similar role, signing a multi-year deal with Boston according to Ken Rosenthal of

Young was once an everyday center fielder for the Diamondbacks, making the All-Star team in 2010 at age 26, but for the past 3-4 years he’s gotten 300-350 plate appearances in a part-time role facing mostly left-handed pitching. He hit .252 with 14 homers and a .773 OPS for the Yankees, but prior to that failed to top a .700 OPS in 2013 or 2014.

Given the Red Sox’s outfield depth–Mookie Betts, Rusney Castillo, Jackie Bradley Jr., and Brock Holt even with Hanley Ramirez back in the infield–Young is unlikely to work his way into everyday playing time at age 32, but he should get another 300 or so plate appearances while also providing a veteran fallback option. And it’s possible his arrival clears the way for a trade.

Marlins hire Juan Nieves as pitching coach

Screen Shot 2015-12-01 at 8.43.08 AM
1 Comment

This is not a terribly big deal compared to the rumors of who the Marlins want to hire as their hitting coach, but it’s news all the same: Miami has hired Juan Nieves as their pitching coach.

Nieves replaces Chuck Hernandez who was let go immediately after the season ended. Under Hernandez Marlins pitchers allowed 4.19 runs a game and had an ERA of 4.02, striking out 1152 batters and walking 508 in 1,427 innings. As far as runs per game go, that was around middle of the pack in the National League, just a hair better than league average. The strikeout/walk ratio, however, was third to last in the NL.

Nieves, a former Brewers hurler who once tossed a no-hitter, was most recently the Red Sox’ pitching coach, serving from the beginning of the 2013 season until his dismissal in May of this year.

In baseball, if you lose the World Series you still get a ring

ST. LOUIS - APRIL 3:  Detail view of the St. Louis Cardinals 2006 World Series Ring at Busch Stadium on April 3, 2007 in St. Louis, Missouri.  (Photo by Scott Rovak/Getty Images)

“Second place is first loser” — some jerk, probably.

The funny thing about “winning is everything” culture in sports is that it’s revered, primarily, by people with the least amount of skin in the game. Self-proclaimed “Super Fans” and talk radio hosts and guys like that. People who may claim to live and breathe sports but who, for the most part, have other things in their lives. Jobs and families and hobbies and stuff. Winning is everything for them on the weekend at, like, Buffalo Wild Wings or in their man cave.

Athletes — whose actual job is to play sports — like to win too. They’re certainly more focused and committed to winning than Joe Super Fan is, what with it being their actual lives and such. But you see far less “winning is everything” sentiment from them. In interviews they talk about how they hate to lose but, with a little bit of distance, they almost always talk about appreciating efforts in a well-played loss. They rarely talk about big losses — even championship losses — as failures or choke jobs or disgraces of one stripe or another.

All of which makes this story by Tim Rohan in the New York Times fun and interesting. It’s about championship rings for the non-championship winners. The 2014 Royals — winners of the A.L. pennant but losers of the World Series — are featured, and the story of rings for World Series losers is told. Mike Stanton, who played on a ton of pennant and World Series-winning teams with the Yankees and Braves, talks about his various rings and how, even though the Braves lost in the World Series that year, 1991 is his favorite.

Also mentioned: George Steinbrenner’s thoughts about rings for World Series losers. You will likely not be surprised about his sentiments on the matter.