History Lesson: media coverage and the triple crown

Leave a comment

Lar at Wezen-Ball
takes a look back at an article from 1997 that, in turn, takes a look
back at Carl Yastrzemski’s 1967 Triple Crown. This quote from Yaz
floored me:

“. . . being in the pennant race, I was so focused that I didn’t
know I had won it until the next day. There wasn’t any media attention
on the Triple Crown. None whatsoever. It was the first time Boston had
been in a pennant race in a long time, and everything and everyone was
focused on it.'”

Could you imagine what would happen today if a player even entered
mid-August with leads in all three of the triple crown categories? ESPN
would embed reporters in the field, talk radio would go absolutely
crazy, and the Internets would probably explode. I can’t even conceive
of there being minor coverage, let alone none.

Beyond that, Lar has some good analysis regarding the odds of
someone winning the triple crown today. I think he’s right when he
notes that hitters are more specialized today, with teams having a much
greater tolerance for power hitters who strike out a lot, which in
turn, drastically lowers their shot at a batting title, especially with
slap hitter like Freddy Sanchez and Ichiro hanging around. Lar thinks
that, among current players, Mauer and Pujols have the best shot of
winning it. I can’t say I disagree, though I think the window will be
closing on Pujols’s chances fairly quickly.

Anyway, good stuff as always from Wezen-Ball.

Let’s play the “how long has it been since the Cubs won the World Series?” game!

1908 Cubs
4 Comments

It started with a no-good St. Louis Cardinals fan being a troublemaker. That no-good Cardinals fan was Drew Silva, who began things innocently enough, noting that, despite their dominance this season, any team can theoretically beat the Chicago Cubs in a short series because that’s just how baseball goes:

Cubs fans started giving him guff for that, so Drew gave some back:

And with that it was on like Donkey Kong (a super old video game which was not invented for another 73 years after the Cubs last won the World Series). I tweeted this:

And with that, my followers went crazy. Here’s a sampling of some of the best ones:

And, for that matter . . .

Too soon. Unlike the last Cubs World Series title.

Like I said, this was just a sampling. I’ve retweeted a ton more on my timeline and those I didn’t retweet can be seen in the replies here. My favorite one may have been “literally the invention of sliced bread,” which debuted in 1912, but I can’t find that tweet.

Please, Cubs fans, have a sense of humor about this. You have a wonderful ballpark that is not named after a third tier mortgage company, a grand history that is fantastic even if it hasn’t featured any championships and a future that is as bright or brighter than any other team out there. Maybe even come up with some of your own in the comments! History is fun! As is self-deprecation! What I’m saying is don’t be salty about this sort of thing. Salty is a bad look.

In other news, the Morton Salt Company was incorporated in 1910, two years after the Cubs last World Series victory.

The Dodgers have rebuffed lowball offers for Yasiel Puig

puig
5 Comments

Jon Heyman reports that the Dodgers have “rebuffed offers” for Yasiel Puig.

Heyman says teams “appear to be bottom feeding for Puig,” making lowball trade proposals. The Dodgers may not have big future plans for Puig, but nor are they gonna sell low on him. And heck, maybe they have bigger plans for him now than they did a couple of weeks ago. He’s batting .396/.448/.698 with four home runs and 12 RBI in 14 games since his demotion to Triple-A Oklahoma. The guy who replaced him, Josh Reddick, is hitting .143/.211/.157 in 20 games since the Dodgers acquired him.

I doubt Puig steps foot in the Dodgers clubhouse before the end of the year, but it’s not like they can’t hold off and trade him in the offseason when teams can imagine him looking good in their uniform next spring.